Divorce Orders and Pension
The term ” pension interest” is defined in the Divorce Act, as far as a member of a pension fund or provident fund is concerned, as :
” the benefit to which that party as such a member would have been entitled in terms of the rules of that fund if his membership of the fund would have been terminated on the date of the divorce on account of his resignation from his office:.
A fund member does not become entitled to a benefit before termination of service. However, in terms of section 7(7) of the Divorce Act a member’s pension interest ( i.e. resignation benefit as at date of divorce) is deemed to be an asset in any divorce action. (The only exception is in respect of a marriage out of community of property on or after 1 November 1984 that excluded profit and loss and the accrual system).
However, the fact that pension interest is deemed to be an asset does not automatically mean that the fund concerned must pay any part of the interest to the former spouse. Section 7(8) of the Act states that a court granting a divorce “may” (not “must”) make an order –
b, that the fund’s records be endorsed
The court therefore has a discretion to make a Section 7(8) order or not. Unless the court order (or the deed of settlement agreed upon by the parties that has been made an order of court) provides that the fund must pay the part of the pension interest awarded to the non – member spouse, the fund may not make such payment. In terms of section 37A of the Pension Funds Act no benefit from a fund may be reduced, transferred, etc, except in certain very limited circumstances, one of which is a valid section 7(8) divorce order against the fund.
In the majority of divorces the parties reach an agreement, called a deed of settlement, which is then made an order of court, Note that the fund (s) concerned must be identifiable from the order.
Where the spouse makes an election (cash or transfer) on or after 1 March 2009 with regard to a section 7(8) award –
The fund’s security in respect of any prior housing loan/guarantee in respect of a member in respect of whom a section 7(8) order was obtained, is protected in terms of section 37D of the Act, i.e the amount payable by the fund must be reduced to take account of the housing loan/guarantee.
No pension interest if service terminated before divorce
As “pension interest” is defined as the resignation benefit that would be payable if the member resigned on the date of divorce, there is no pension interest that can be awarded in terms of section 7(8) if the member’s service was terminated before the date of divorce. This has been confirmed by the Supreme Court of Appeal in the case of Eskom Pension Fund v Krugel. The only exception (based on section 37D(6) of the Pension Funds Act) is in the case of a preservation fund – such exception applies with effect from 1 November 2008.